Which part of an argument serves as the link between the claim and evidence?

In the structure of an argument, the warrant plays a crucial role as it connects the claim to the evidence presented. The claim represents the main point or assertion that the speaker or writer is trying to prove, while the evidence comprises the data, facts, or reasons that support this claim. The warrant is the underlying reasoning that justifies why the evidence is relevant and adequate to support the claim. It helps the audience understand the logical relationship between what is being claimed and the supporting information provided.

For instance, if a speaker claims that a certain policy will reduce crime rates, the evidence might include statistics from studies demonstrating the effectiveness of similar policies. The warrant would clarify why those statistics are applicable to the current claim, such as by explaining the mechanisms through which the policy is expected to lead to lower crime rates. Without a warrant, the audience may question the validity of the link between the claim and the evidence, making the argument less persuasive.

Understanding the importance of the warrant is essential in constructing solid arguments and effectively communicating ideas, particularly in public speaking contexts.