What is the purpose of making inferences in 'inductive reasoning'?

Making inferences in inductive reasoning is fundamentally about using specific examples to draw broader general conclusions. This process involves observing particular instances and then inferring a general rule or trend based on the patterns identified in those specific cases. For instance, if someone notices that the sun has risen in the east every morning observed, they may infer that the sun always rises in the east. This method is essential in inductive reasoning because it allows for the formation of hypotheses and theories based on empirical evidence, laying the groundwork for broader understanding.

The other options relate to different reasoning processes. Applying specific rules generally aligns with deductive reasoning, where a general principle is applied to a specific case. Verifying established facts relates to a factual or empirical approach, typically not involving the inferential process inherent in induction. Outlining logical structures refers more to the organization of thinking rather than the process of inferring from specific examples. Thus, utilizing specific examples for generalization is indeed the core purpose of making inferences in inductive reasoning.